Harris and Biden both said they wouldn't take the "Trump vaccine". Then, when they got into power (through a suspect - ahem - election) they imposed mandates. There are also excellent videos of Fauci's Doublespeak antics.
Speaking of which, the victims of the Orwellian Doublespeak (the conformist normie), but a year after the government of Chinada "suspended" mandates, were out in full force gaslighting how there were no lockdowns or mandates. It was, you see, all in our heads. It was all one big Newhart dream. Canada is a benevolent country committed to civil liberties, 'mkay?
Question: With the SCC's ruling against her, has a precedent been set whereby the doctor-patient priviilege has been usurped? It's clear the SCC is going to go along with the government's 'Top-down-One size fits all-One Health' agenda. Civil liberties and privacy rights be damned. EMERGENCY DIKTATS BEFORE MEDICAL RIGHTS.
Years ago when .www was taking off my first thought was “finally, government can no longer hide, they’re now going to be accountable”. Geezus was I ever wrong on that one…
It felt like elder abuse. But OTOH from what has come out from behind the scenes he brought it on himself by being completely unwilling to step down. He loved the power and wanted 4 more years of it. (And my guess is, he loved the $$ that he generated from being "The Big Guy" - that's a somewhat obscure reference to the Hunter Biden laptop information that surfaced, in case you're not as far down the rabbit hole as I am! :-) )
Great article with some good examples! I wish this would happen with masking and health care facilities. My in-laws just got into a LTC home and of course, there's a covid outbreak. We can't visit them unless we are willing to wear a mask and a shield!
We visited my husband's grandmother almost weekly when she was in LTC years ago and we never had to wear masks nor do I even remember hearing about outbreaks of respiratory viruses.
That's ridiculous! Not a shred of real evidence that masks reduce transmission of respiratory viruses--and they severely impact the quality of interaction between people, especially older people who don't hear too well. It's infuriating.
I do appreciate the confirmation. I feel that wearing the masks is stressful for the elderly not just because of the difficulty with hearing but just seeing the masks all the time and this will lead them to be more susceptible to illness. We made the decision as a family that we will not go in to the home as long as this policy is in place and it's going to be hard because we don't know how long that will be. The rest of the family will be visiting so we know they will have regular visitors.
PS: Christine - I (Chris) wrote a series of 7 articles on masks if you scroll back. At the request of a nursing colleague I recently printed them all to give to her and she said "You should make this a book", so we may do so. (likely just e-book, but who knows) The first is here: https://pairodocs.substack.com/p/the-science-and-politics-of-masks
I know what you are saying. We don't want to lose the time but right now they are in separate rooms and other people are in with them so can't do that. My husband gets panic attacks when he wears masks and also has some hearing issues which will make communicating very difficult.
If they get their own room together,then we can do that.
Thanks for documenting the double standards, and historical revisionism. One example I love is how Wikipedia deliberately changed the expression 'Cultural Marxism' to now be a 'conspiracy theory'. Some years ago, it was just simply described. You can find examples on the internet showing the two pages (original and revised) side by side. It still exists today as the 'conspiracy theory': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory. It is an engineered misrepresentation.
They did the same thing with the phrase "sexual preference" -- which was always a neutral description and not a pejorative one--until conservative justice Amy Comey Barrett was being interviewed for a supreme court position and she used that term. It was literally edited in real time to make it seem like a homophobic slur so that they could hold it against her. Astonishing.
Definitely Wikipedia has been weaponized. My one hope, and the US election seems to provide some empirical evidence for this, is that normies are catching on to the lies and bad faith of the MSM.
Once The Donald began speaking directly to the citizenry through Twitter, the media knew their influence was gone and they've managed to completely destroy their credibility in the meantime. In desperation they've doubled down - in the voice over for the debate video, they sound like the Democratic Comms Department. Terminal TDS.
(Chris here) So well put. It is so true. The up-side of the internet has been that it has taken away the MSM's power to control the narrative. I agree. The debate "moderation" in both cases made it two against one, rather than one-on-one with a referee.
Just an update on the LTC place and the masking policies. The outbreak is now for covid and rhinovirus. Also, you only have to wear masks in the halls but don't need to in the family dining hall. This shows that it's not about health and nothing has changed for this place.
Harris and Biden both said they wouldn't take the "Trump vaccine". Then, when they got into power (through a suspect - ahem - election) they imposed mandates. There are also excellent videos of Fauci's Doublespeak antics.
Speaking of which, the victims of the Orwellian Doublespeak (the conformist normie), but a year after the government of Chinada "suspended" mandates, were out in full force gaslighting how there were no lockdowns or mandates. It was, you see, all in our heads. It was all one big Newhart dream. Canada is a benevolent country committed to civil liberties, 'mkay?
https://www.owensoundsuntimes.com/news/local-news/doctor-who-spoke-out-against-vaccine-mandates-will-turn-over-records
They debanked her as well.
Question: With the SCC's ruling against her, has a precedent been set whereby the doctor-patient priviilege has been usurped? It's clear the SCC is going to go along with the government's 'Top-down-One size fits all-One Health' agenda. Civil liberties and privacy rights be damned. EMERGENCY DIKTATS BEFORE MEDICAL RIGHTS.
Years ago when .www was taking off my first thought was “finally, government can no longer hide, they’re now going to be accountable”. Geezus was I ever wrong on that one…
Me too Nick! Same thing - I only saw the opportunities for sharing information, not for controlling it. Man I was naive.
A great article showing the double speak as I call it. And look at the culprits who are in the front row of it all.
I am no Biden fan but I have to say, putting him through that "debate" was abuse, pure and simple.
It felt like elder abuse. But OTOH from what has come out from behind the scenes he brought it on himself by being completely unwilling to step down. He loved the power and wanted 4 more years of it. (And my guess is, he loved the $$ that he generated from being "The Big Guy" - that's a somewhat obscure reference to the Hunter Biden laptop information that surfaced, in case you're not as far down the rabbit hole as I am! :-) )
I wonder how much of it was him wanting to continue on versus Jill🤔
Ten percent for The Big Guy!
Ya karmas a bitch..
Great article with some good examples! I wish this would happen with masking and health care facilities. My in-laws just got into a LTC home and of course, there's a covid outbreak. We can't visit them unless we are willing to wear a mask and a shield!
We visited my husband's grandmother almost weekly when she was in LTC years ago and we never had to wear masks nor do I even remember hearing about outbreaks of respiratory viruses.
That's ridiculous! Not a shred of real evidence that masks reduce transmission of respiratory viruses--and they severely impact the quality of interaction between people, especially older people who don't hear too well. It's infuriating.
I do appreciate the confirmation. I feel that wearing the masks is stressful for the elderly not just because of the difficulty with hearing but just seeing the masks all the time and this will lead them to be more susceptible to illness. We made the decision as a family that we will not go in to the home as long as this policy is in place and it's going to be hard because we don't know how long that will be. The rest of the family will be visiting so we know they will have regular visitors.
PS: Christine - I (Chris) wrote a series of 7 articles on masks if you scroll back. At the request of a nursing colleague I recently printed them all to give to her and she said "You should make this a book", so we may do so. (likely just e-book, but who knows) The first is here: https://pairodocs.substack.com/p/the-science-and-politics-of-masks
Thank you. I will check that out. I'm sure I read those when you posted them but will read them again.
don't lose time with your in-laws, wear the mask until you get in their room and then take it off
Hi Irene,
I know what you are saying. We don't want to lose the time but right now they are in separate rooms and other people are in with them so can't do that. My husband gets panic attacks when he wears masks and also has some hearing issues which will make communicating very difficult.
If they get their own room together,then we can do that.
Thanks for documenting the double standards, and historical revisionism. One example I love is how Wikipedia deliberately changed the expression 'Cultural Marxism' to now be a 'conspiracy theory'. Some years ago, it was just simply described. You can find examples on the internet showing the two pages (original and revised) side by side. It still exists today as the 'conspiracy theory': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory. It is an engineered misrepresentation.
They did the same thing with the phrase "sexual preference" -- which was always a neutral description and not a pejorative one--until conservative justice Amy Comey Barrett was being interviewed for a supreme court position and she used that term. It was literally edited in real time to make it seem like a homophobic slur so that they could hold it against her. Astonishing.
Definitely Wikipedia has been weaponized. My one hope, and the US election seems to provide some empirical evidence for this, is that normies are catching on to the lies and bad faith of the MSM.
Some of the normies are catching on, but nearly enough of them and not fast enough.
Amazing research guys. I enjoyed this one.
Great article with fantastic examples. Show this to your MSM watching friends or TDS sufferers.
100% agree. Good selection of examples of msm’s attempt to manufacture consent. Not so easy with the internet.
Masterly....and so say all of us!
Once The Donald began speaking directly to the citizenry through Twitter, the media knew their influence was gone and they've managed to completely destroy their credibility in the meantime. In desperation they've doubled down - in the voice over for the debate video, they sound like the Democratic Comms Department. Terminal TDS.
(Chris here) So well put. It is so true. The up-side of the internet has been that it has taken away the MSM's power to control the narrative. I agree. The debate "moderation" in both cases made it two against one, rather than one-on-one with a referee.
Just an update on the LTC place and the masking policies. The outbreak is now for covid and rhinovirus. Also, you only have to wear masks in the halls but don't need to in the family dining hall. This shows that it's not about health and nothing has changed for this place.
So disappointing. All for show.