Julie and Chris - thank you again for taking this leadership role on in Canada fighting the creep of government into all aspects of life of citizenry for political goals. This speaker is like all your speakers - absolutely excellent. And motivational to find highly competent people like yourselves and your speaker to throw our weight behind and make sure that the voices being stifled by government and big-tech are not the only ones heard.
I wish you success with your conference in Baddeck. I have enjoyed listening to your interviews with interesting and knowledgeable people, and feel optimistic to know that you and others are speaking the truth. Thank you.
Julie and Chris - thank you again for taking this leadership role on in Canada fighting the creep of government into all aspects of life of citizenry for political goals. This speaker is like all your speakers - absolutely excellent. And motivational to find highly competent people like yourselves and your speaker to throw our weight behind and make sure that the voices being stifled by government and big-tech are not the only ones heard.
I wish you success with your conference in Baddeck. I have enjoyed listening to your interviews with interesting and knowledgeable people, and feel optimistic to know that you and others are speaking the truth. Thank you.
Very kind of you thanks so much!!!
So glad we have another Dr. living in and seeking truth and has joined CCCA.
As long as we're focused on "harms" we're talking about 'exemptions' instead of principles. This outlook is what LOST us the resistance.
For jabs. We must ban mandates to forced medical procedures, not this erroneous focus on harms.
Regarding face hiding. The "no harms" arguments are irrelevant. The core principle is NO EFFICIENCY. This is the core principle we must return to.
I disagree. The core principle is patient autonomy. Your 2nd comment and 3rd are self-contradictory if you actually think about "principles".
Patient autonomy FROM mandates. Without the mandates, the "harms" is moot.
Because of the g"harms" based analysis, we took an "exemptions" approach to vax and masks to accommodate for "medical" or "spiritual" harms.
No to the "exemptions" cuz "harms" approach.
Without mandates there's no need for any of the bs exemptions.
The principle we must fight for is NO MANDATES.
If we don't do this they will repeat the last three years over and. And over again.